USPTO serial 78717520
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and espresso beverages not being dairy or vegetable based, and beverages made with a base of coffee or espresso, beverages-ages made with a base of tea, powdered chocolate and vanilla not being dairy or vegetable based, flavoring syrups to add to beverages, namely, coffee-fee flavored syrup used to make bever-ages; baked goods, namely, muffins, scones, biscuits, cookies, pastries and breads,sandwiches; breakfast cereal, namely, hot and cold ready-to-eat fruit and whole grain based cereal, iced tea, ready-to-drink tea, powdered iced tea mix; beverages made with a base of chocolate not being dairy or vegetable based; ready-to-drink choco-late beverages not being dairy or vegetable based; beverages made with a mix of chocolate and coffee flavors not being dairy or vegetable based; liquid and powdered beverage mixes, namely, coffee flavored mixes for beverages; chocolate powdered flavorings for beverages; cocoa; cocoa products, namely, hot chocolate; cocoa pow-der, drinking chocolate not being dairy or vegetable based, beverages made from or containing chocolate not being dairy or vegetable based; beverages made from or containing cocoa not being dairy or vegetable based; preparations for making choco-late or cocoa based drinks not being dairy or vegetable based; chocolate and candy,namely chocolates, chocolate bars, chocolate covered coffee beans, chocolate truf-fles, chocolate-covered fruits, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate covered dried fruits,chocolate covered crackers and chocolate toppings | ACTIVE | Sep 13, 2005 |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorships, retail outlets, mail order services and computer online ordering services featuring ground and whole bean coffee, tea, cocoa, coffee and espresso beverages and beverages made with a base of coffee, espresso, or milk, pow-dered flavorings, flavoring syrups, baked goods, including muffins, scones, biscuits,cookies, pastries, cakes and breads, and ready-to-make mixes of the same, packaged foods, sandwiches and prepared foods, chocolate and confectionery items, ready-to-eat cereals, dried fruits, spreads, juices, soft drinks, electric appliances, namely, kettles,coffee makers-, espresso makers and coffee grinders, house wares, non-electric appli-ances and related items, namely, hand-operated coffee grinders and coffee mills,insulated coffee and beverage cups, collapsible cup carriers and caddies non-paper coasters, insulated vacuum bottles, coffee cups, tea cups and mugs, glassware, dishes,plates and bowls, trivets, storage canisters, non-electric drip coffee makers and non-electric plunger-style coffee makers, paper and non- paper coffee filters, furniture,watches, clocks, toys, books, musical recordings, T-shirts, caps, sweatshirts, jackets,aprons and other clothing items | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |