USPTO serial 78717668
VALDEZ FAMILY WINE CELLARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALDEZ FAMILY WINE CELLARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cloverdale, CA
Cloverdale, CA
Cloverdale, CA
Cloverdale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Russell
JOHN E. RUSSELL ALLMARK TRADEMARK4041 SUGAR MAPLE DR., STE ADANVILLE, CA 94506-4640UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Valdez, Ulises
- Other trademarks owned by Valdez, Ulises
- Other trademarks owned by Valdez, Adelina
- Other trademarks owned by Valdez, Adelina
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named VALDEZ FAMILY WINE CELLARS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |