USPTO serial 78717835
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Wadyka, Jr.
Steven J. Wadyka, Jr. Greenberg Traurig, LLP2101 L STREET NWSUITE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20037| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Facilities management of technical operations; inventory planning in the nature of inventory management and inventory control, both for space flight and space exploration missions; business management services, namely, logistics and supply chain management; testing, analysis and evaluation of the professional proficiency of others for purposes of certification; and logistics management in the fields of space flight and space exploration missions, space facilities operations, space hardware processing, vehicle processing related to space hardware, risk assessment tasks related to space flights, space mission planning and control, and in the fields of space mission configuration verification, configuration management, payload management, payload planning and payload integration | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2005 |
| 040 | Assembly of spacecraft and vehicles to the order and specification of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2005 |
| 041 | Space flight and space exploration systems training; space launch and flight controller training; computer hardware processing training | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2005 |
| 042 | Engineering project management in the fields of space shuttle and other space flight missions, space exploration missions, space flight launches, space flight operations, and ground operations related to space flight missions; space exploration operations, namely, aerospace engineering technical consultation, engineering, aerospace engineering, and systems engineering services, all for the space exploration and space flight industries in the areas of mission control systems operation and management, flight design and integrated mission planning, simulation and execution, space flight mission contingency planning and execution, and operational technical support and analysis of mission-related computer hardware and software; engineering contingency planning and execution in the nature of engineering services involving the design of equipment for space flight and space exploration missions; orbital systems control and management in the field of space flight and space exploration, namely, technical support in the nature of troubleshooting computer hardware and software problems for orbital electronic communications equipment and monitoring of computer and electronic network systems used both on the ground and on space craft in the field of space flight and space exploration; real-time systems and control systems center operations in the nature of technical support in the nature of troubleshooting computer hardware and software problems for the electronic communication networks and equipment that are used for space flight and space exploration; reviewing standards and practices to ensure compliance with laws, regulations and industry standards pertaining to space flight and space exploration programs; software development and integration in the field of space flight and space exploration; and providing quality assurance services in the field of space exploration and space flight programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |