USPTO serial 78717857
TAKE-AWAY GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAKE-AWAY GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Almond cake; Bakery desserts; Bakery goods; Bakery products; Bakery products, namely sweet bakery goods; Bread; Bread and buns; Bread crumb; Bread doughs; Bread sticks; Bread with soy bean; Buns; Cake doughs; Cake mixes; Cakes; Cakes of sugar-bounded millet or popped rice ; Cereal based snack food; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Cookies; Cracker and cheese combinations; Crackers; Cream buns; Doughnuts; Fried dough cookies ; Fruit cakes; Fruit pies; Ice-cream cakes; Iced cakes; Jam buns; Meat pies; Meat pies ; Mincemeat pies; Mixes for bakery goods; Muffins; Pies; Pita bread; Pita chips; Pot pies; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; Rice cakes; Rice crackers ; Rice-based snack foods; Rolls ; Snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; Soft pin-rolled cakes of pounded rice ; Sponge cakes; Steamed buns stuffed with minced meat ; Stuffing mixes containing bread; Sweet pounded rice cakes ; Unleavened bread in thin sheets; Wheat-based snack foods; Wholemeal bread | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |