Drawing for NANO WALLET

USPTO serial 78717891

NANO WALLET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANO WALLET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kelly Phair McCarthy

KELLY PHAIR MCCARTHY TOMLINSON ZISKO LLP200 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Carrying cases and bags designed for storage and transportation of personal electronics, namely, mp3 players and personal music recording and playing devicesACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring carrying cases and bags designed for storage and transportation of personal electronics, namely, mp3 players and personal music recording and playing devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 6, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 5, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance