Drawing for CREATIVE CHANGE THROUGH IMAGINATION

USPTO serial 78717982

CREATIVE CHANGE THROUGH IMAGINATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREATIVE CHANGE THROUGH IMAGINATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori Lee Yamato

LORI LEE YAMATO KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Arranging, namely, planning and organizing and conducting , namely, hosting business meetings and business sessions in order to convene creative and innovative leaders in businesses and corporations, community development agencies, educational organizations, governmental organizations, and nonprofit organizations to collaboratively create initiatives for innovative and improvised positive change in the areas of business and educationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance