USPTO serial 78718241
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Lampel
JUSTIN LAMPEL LAMPEL & ASSOCIATES PC555 SKOKIE BLVD STE 500NORTHBROOK, IL 60062UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Estate planning; Evaluation of real property; Land acquisition, namely, real estate brokerage; Leasing of real estate; Leasing of real property; Operating marketplaces for sellers of goods and/or services ; Real estate acquisition services; Real estate agencies; Real estate brokerage; Real estate consultancy; Real estate consultation; Real estate investment; Real estate listing; Real estate management; Real estate multiple listing services; Real estate procurement for others; Real estate time-sharing; Real estate valuations | PARTIALLY PAID | Sep 19, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |