USPTO serial 78718366
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Long Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin P. Steinman
KEVIN P STEINMAN KEVIN P STEINMAN435 S DETROIT ST STE 304LOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Battery operated action toys; Bendable toys; Cases for toy structures; Cases for toy vehicles; Children's multiple activity toys; Collectable toy figures; Construction toys; Disc toss toys; Drawing toys; Electric action toys; Electric toy train transformers; Electronically operated toy motor vehicles; Flying saucers ; Lever action toys; Mechanical action toys; Mechanical toys; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Molded toy figures; Non-riding transportation toys; Pull toys; Push toys; Radio controlled toy vehicles; Toy action figures; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy airplanes; Toy construction sets; Toy model cars; Toy model kit cars; Toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as units; Toy trains and parts and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles with transforming parts; Transforming robotic toy vehicles; Transforming robotic toys; Wind-up toys | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |