Drawing for ITS SPICY

USPTO serial 78718586

ITS SPICY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ITS SPICY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Goldsmith

Michael B. Goldsmith Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.One Rockefeller PlazaIntellectual Property DepartmentNew York, NY 10020

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025MEN'S AND WOMEN'S CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, KNIT TOPS and BOTTOMS, WOVEN TOPS and BOTTOMS, SHIRTS, PANTS, JEANS, SWEATERS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, SUITS, PANTSUITS, COATS, BELTS, SHOES, HOSIERY AND SOCKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 7, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 12, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance