USPTO serial 78718934
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean M. Novak, Esq.
SEAN M NOVAK ESQ NOVAK & BEN-COHEN LLP400 CORPORATE POINTE STE 550CULVER CITY, CA 90230-7615UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Antireflection coated eyeglasses; Cases for children's eye glasses; Children's eye glasses; Corrective glasses; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass chains; Eyeglass frames; Eyeglass lenses; Eyeglasses; Frames for eyeglasses and pince-nez; Frames for glasses and pince-nez; Glacier eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for cutting drilling, marking, engraving and shaping optical lenses for eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for drilling optical lenses for eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for engraving and tinting optical lenses for eyeglasses; Optical glasses; Protective eye pieces; Protective eyeglasses; Protective glasses; Reading eyeglasses; Reading glasses; Side guards for eyeglasses; Ski glasses; Spectacles ; Sports glasses; Sports training eyeglasses; Sports' glasses | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |