Drawing for SPARE PAIR VISION CENTER

USPTO serial 78718934

SPARE PAIR VISION CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPARE PAIR VISION CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean M. Novak, Esq.

SEAN M NOVAK ESQ NOVAK & BEN-COHEN LLP400 CORPORATE POINTE STE 550CULVER CITY, CA 90230-7615UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Antireflection coated eyeglasses; Cases for children's eye glasses; Children's eye glasses; Corrective glasses; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass chains; Eyeglass frames; Eyeglass lenses; Eyeglasses; Frames for eyeglasses and pince-nez; Frames for glasses and pince-nez; Glacier eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for cutting drilling, marking, engraving and shaping optical lenses for eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for drilling optical lenses for eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for engraving and tinting optical lenses for eyeglasses; Optical glasses; Protective eye pieces; Protective eyeglasses; Protective glasses; Reading eyeglasses; Reading glasses; Side guards for eyeglasses; Ski glasses; Spectacles ; Sports glasses; Sports training eyeglasses; Sports' glassesACTIVEAug 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2006UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Nov 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 11, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance