USPTO serial 78719079
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward F. Perlman
EDWARD F. PERLMAN WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic equipment, namely, computers, printers, fax machines, photocopiers, telephones, calculators; blank computer disks; overhead projectors, namely, picture projectors and multimedia projectors; and electronic safes | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Office supplies, namely, pens, pencils, markers, storage boxes, file folders, adhesive labels, staplers, rubber bands, paper clips, binders, indexes for binders and calendars; stationery, namely, paper, paper pads, notebooks, message pads and envelopes; racks and sorters, namely, letter racks, file racks, file sorters and memo sorters; adhesive tape for stationary purposes; document and paper binding machines and laminating machines for home, office and commercial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail photocopying services; retail store services featuring discount office supplies, stationery, printing equipment, electronic equipment, and office furniture; advertising and business services, namely, photocopying services; word processing and typing services; photocopying, reproducing, and compiling documents for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of messages and data, namely, electronic mail services and facsimile transmission; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Paper treatment; laminating of paper; bindery services for others, namely, collating, folding, stapling, perforating, cutting and binding of printed, photocopied and typewritten materials; miscellaneous services, namely, printing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |