Drawing for NANOPROTECTOR

USPTO serial 78719106

NANOPROTECTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOPROTECTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Hyde

LINDA HEILMAN RECKITT BENCKISER INC1655 VALLEY RDWAYNE, NJ 07470UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely laundry bleach, for household use, namely for laundry and dishwashing uses; laundry preparations for dry cleaning, namely dry cleaning fluids; dishwasher cleaner; polishing preparations for kitchen and glassware; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations, namely liquids and powders, but excluding automobile products; carpet cleaners; soaps; disinfectant soaps; decalcifying and descaling preparations for household use; fabric softeners; laundry additives, namely laundry bleach ; stain removers; all the aforementioned goods with or without a disinfecting component.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 8, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 8, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance