USPTO serial 78719212
PERFECT BODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFECT BODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard Malina
BERNARD MALINA MALINA & ASSOCIATES PC60 E 42ND ST RM 501NEW YORK, NY 10165-0502UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic products for the face and body, namely, bath gel, shower gel, non-medicated body scrub, body lotion, hand lotion, non-medicated foot lotion, body oil, aromatherapy oils, aromatherapy bath beads or scented stones, bubble bath in the shape of flower petals, bath beads, body butter, body powder, talcum powder, bath salts, non-medicated hand and foot soaks, body spray, body splash, bath milks, bubble bath, bath lotions, bath soap, hand soap, foam bath, effervescent bath crystals and salts for non-medical use, bath fizz balls, massage oils, gel eye mask, soothing eye mask, herbal eye mask, skin moisturizers incorporated into socks, booties and gloves, and pumice stones for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |