USPTO serial 78719457
SAVVY COUPLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3446634Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAVVY COUPLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nina L. Kaufman, Esq.
Nina L. Kaufman, Esq. Nina L. Kaufman, Esq.230 Park Avenue, Suite 1000New York, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and workshops for couples regarding financial planning, and distributing course materials in the nature of tapes, CDs, and books, in connection therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |