Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78720039?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78720039. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns BAD BOY WOLO?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78720039, the listed owner(s) include: Wolo Manufacturing Corp..

What is USPTO serial number 78720039?

Serial number 78720039 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark BAD BOY WOLO. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover BAD BOY WOLO?

The public record lists International Classes: 012. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78720039

BAD BOY WOLO

Q: What is the current status of BAD BOY WOLO?

BAD BOY WOLO (78720039) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601

Filing date: Sep 25, 2005
Status date: Mar 3, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAD BOY WOLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Wolo Manufacturing Corp.
Deer Park, NY
Other trademarks owned by Wolo Manufacturing Corp.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
012	Horns for vehicles	ACTIVE	Nov 17, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Mar 3, 2011	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Mar 3, 2011	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Mar 2, 2011	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Oct 20, 2010	DMCC	DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED	—
Oct 16, 2010	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Oct 16, 2010	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2010	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2010	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Mar 25, 2010	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Sep 8, 2009	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Mar 25, 2009	IUAA	USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED	—
Mar 25, 2009	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Mar 25, 2009	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Mar 24, 2009	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
Feb 24, 2009	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Aug 14, 2008	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 24, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Nov 28, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 27, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 27, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 11, 2006	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Oct 11, 2006	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Oct 11, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 26, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 26, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Sep 30, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—