USPTO serial 78720303
PINK U
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3750738Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 16, 2010
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PINK U?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
Reynoldsburg, OH
Other trademarks owned by Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
Reynoldsburg, OH
Other trademarks owned by Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
Reynoldsburg, OH
Other trademarks owned by Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SARAH CRISPI
MARIA J. ROCHA LIMITED BRANDS666 FIFTH AVENUELEGAL - IP DEPT., 4TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | PANTIES, T-SHIRTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 29, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PINK U
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 3, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |