USPTO serial 78720654
ZUUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZUUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRESERJE, SI
PRESERJE, SI
Preserje, SI
Brezovica, SI
KRANJ, SI
KRANJ, SI
KRANJ, SI
Kranj, SI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah M. Lodge
Deborah M. Lodge PATTON BOGGS LLP2550 M ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1350UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware for use in the operation of gaming machines; interactive electronic light and sound displays for use in connection with amusement games and gaming machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUPNIK, GREGOR
- Other trademarks owned by RUPNIK, GREGOR
- Other trademarks owned by Rupnik, Gregor
- Other trademarks owned by Hercog, Ivan
- Other trademarks owned by KOLMAN, MITJA
- Other trademarks owned by KOLMAN, MITJA
- Other trademarks owned by KOLMAN, MITJA
- Other trademarks owned by Kolman, Mitja
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ZUUM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |