Drawing for INVAZORZ

USPTO serial 78720687

INVAZORZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INVAZORZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian S. Steinberger

Brian S. Steinberger LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN S. STEINBERGER, P.A101 BREVARD AVECOCOA, FL 32922UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computerized games, namely, computerized video table games for gaming purposes, computer game programs; video games, namely, video game discs, interactive video game programs, video game software; electronic game equipment for playing video games, namely, hand-held joy stick units; helmets for athletic use, namely, sports helmets, football helmets, and hockey helmetsACTIVE—
028Toys, games and playthings, namely, card games, board games, plush animals, action figures and accessories therefor, balloons, toy candy dispensers and holders, toy vehicles, dolls, arcade-type electronic video games, stand alone video game machines, hand-held pinball games, non-electric hand-held action skill games, toy model vehicles and related accessories therefor sold as units, play sets for action figures, play sets for toy vehicles, skateboards, surfboards, skim boards, wakeboards, snow sleds for recreational use, toy scooters, wheels for skateboarding, sports balls, stuffed toys, three-dimensional puzzles, toy model hobby craft kits, toy model rockets and accessories therefor sold as a unit, toy weapons, jigsaw puzzles, amusement park rides, beach toys, namely, inflatable toys; water squirting toys, construction toys, toy building blocks and connecting links for the same; athletic protective pads and padding for skateboarding, in-line skating and roller skating; elbow pads and knee pads for athletic use, costume masks, kites, party favors in the nature of small toys, ride-on toys, inflatable pool toys, toy foam weapons, toy gliders, flying toy vehicles, remote controlled flying toys, remote controlled toy vehicles, wind-up toys, disc-type toss toys, musical toys, toy walkie-talkies, and bubble making wands and solution setsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance