USPTO serial 78720854
ORPHANAGE ANIMATION STUDIOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORPHANAGE ANIMATION STUDIOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francie R. Gorowitz
Francie R. Gorowitz Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPSuite 26002029 Century Park EastLos Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, development, production and distribution of motion pictures, films, television programs, radio programs, interactive television programs, internet programs, and mobile and wireless programs, in the fields of animated and live-action entertainment, fiction, non-fiction, science fiction, mystery, fairy tales, romance, comedy, drama, musicals, fantasy, reality, unscripted, sports, news, talk shows, variety, travel, documentaries, movie reviews, psychology, education, instructional, recreation, live performances, individual entertainers, cultures and cultural events, and music; audio recording production and distribution of animated and live action entertainment, fiction, non-fiction, science fiction, mystery, fairy tales, romance, comedy, drama, musicals, fantasy, reality, unscripted, sports, news, talk shows, variety, travel, documentaries, movie reviews, psychology, education, instructional, recreation, live performances, individual entertainers, cultures and cultural events, and music; entertainment in the nature of theater productions in the fields of animated and live-action entertainment, fiction, non-fiction, science fiction, mystery, fairy tales, romance, comedy, drama, musicals, fantasy, reality, unscripted, sports, news, talk shows, variety, travel, documentaries, movie reviews, psychology, education, instructional, recreation, live performances, individual entertainers, cultures and cultural events, and music; publication of books, magazines, novelizations, graphic novels, cartoons, comic strips and comic books; fan club services; electronic game services provided on-line from databases or web sites on the internet and via mobile and wireless devices; entertainment services, namely providing prerecorded providing digital music all online via the internet and via mobile and wireless devices; providing nondownloadable electronic publications in the nature of children's books, novels, graphic novels and comic books in the fields of animated and live-action entertainment, fiction, non-fiction, science fiction, mystery, fairy tales, romance, comedy, drama, musicals, fantasy, reality, unscripted, sports, news, talk shows, variety, travel, documentaries, movie reviews, psychology, education, instructional, recreation, live performances, individual entertainers, cultures and cultural events, and music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |