USPTO serial 78721198
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen Holmes
STEPHEN HOLMES BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES101 DYER ST FL 5PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-3926UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin creams; Skin toners; Wrinkle resistant cream; Skin cleansing cream; Skin moisturizer; Non-medicated skin creams; Hand creams; Face creams for cosmetic use; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic cleansing creams; Anti-wrinkle creams; Anti-aging cream; Hair nourishers; Hair lotions; Lotions for strengthening the nails; Nail care preparations; Nail cream; and Nail strengtheners | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Herbal supplements; Dietary supplements; Food supplements, namely, anti-oxidants; Calcium supplements; Mineral nutritional supplements; Mineral supplements; Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Nutritional supplements in lotion form sold as a component of nutritional skin care products; Vitamin and mineral supplements; Vitamin C preparations; and Nail fungus treatment preparations | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |