Drawing for TWINKLEWARE

USPTO serial 78721245

TWINKLEWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWINKLEWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Hope Aguilar

M HOPE AGUILAR ARVIC SEARCH SERVICES INC.521 3RD AVE SWSTE 280CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P3T3,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Household utensils, namely, semi-worked glass containing light emitting diodes and powered by normal house currentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 19, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 17, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 15, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance