USPTO serial 78721282
THE 3RD CUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE 3RD CUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen Wetherell Davis
KAREN WETHERELL DAVIS ELLIOTT, OSTRANDER & PRESTON PC707 SW WASHINGTON ST STE 1500PORTLAND, OR 97205-3532UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mail order, retail, and on-line retail store services featuring the following-- coffee; tea; cocoa; prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; prepared espresso and espresso-based beverages; tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; powdered chocolate and vanilla; flavoring syrups to add to beverages; baked goods, namely muffins, scones, biscuits, cookies, pastries and breads; sandwiches; hot and cold ready-to-eat fruit and whole grain based breakfast cereal; iced tea, ready-to-drink tea, powdered iced tea mix; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based with coffee flavors; chocolate drink base; powdered food flavorings; cocoa products, namely cocoa mixes and cocoa powder; hot chocolate; cocoa beverages with milk; prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; chocolate syrup; preparations for making chocolate or cocoa based drinks, namely powdered hot chocolate mix and powdered hot cocoa mix; chocolate and candy, namely filled chocolate chocolates, chocolate bars, chocolate-covered coffee beans, chocolate truffles, chocolate-covered fruits, chocolate-covered nuts, chocolate-covered dried fruits, chocolate-covered crackers and chocolate toppings; electric appliances, namely kettles, coffee makers, espresso makers and coffee grinders; housewares, non-electric appliances and related items, namely hand operated coffee grinders and coffee mills, insulated coffee and beverage cups made of plastics; insulated coffee and beverage cups made of ceramics; collapsible cup carriers and caddies, non-paper coasters, insulated vacuum bottles, coffee cups, tea cups and mugs, glassware, dishes, plates and bowls, trivets, storage canisters, non-electric drip coffee makers and non-electric plunger-style coffee makers; paper and non paper coffee filters; T-shirts, caps, sweatshirts, jackets, aprons and other clothing items; and distributorship services of all the foregoing goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |