USPTO serial 78721414
NATURAL ELEMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURAL ELEMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath salts ; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Conditioners ; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Face creams for cosmetic use; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair gel; Hair gels; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair shampoo; Hair styling gel; Lotions for face and body care; Medicated soap; Medicated soaps; Oils for hair conditioning; Shampoos not acceptable alone, but acceptable in a list of cosmetics or hair care products; Soaps for body care; Sun care lotions | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2008 |
| 005 | Medicated hand wash; Medicated shampoo | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |