USPTO serial 78721745
FLOWERPOT PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3942056Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2011
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLOWERPOT PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Plumley
David A. Plumley LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLPP.O. Box 29001Glendale, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COUNSELING IN THE FIELD OF PUBLICITY TO ASSIST ARTISTS, ENSEMBLES, MANAGERS OF ARTISTS AND ENSEMBLES, AND TALENT AGENTS IN THE CREATION AND MARKETING OF PERFORMANCES, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTIONS AND TOURING PACKAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSULTATION REGARDING AND PROVIDING CREATIVE SERVICES RELATING TO THE CREATION AND ORGANIZATION OF PERFORMANCES, LIVE SHOWS AND TOURING PACKAGES FOR ARTISTS, ENSEMBLES, MANAGERS OF ARTISTS AND ENSEMBLES, AND AGENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Flower Pot Productions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Flower Pot Productions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Flower Pot Productions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FLOWERPOT PRODUCTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 5, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |