USPTO serial 78721942
SNAP PANEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3266725Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SNAP PANEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bedford, MA
Bedford, MA
WICHITA, KS
Wichita, KS
ATTENDORN, DE
ATTENDORN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPre'
John L. DuPre' HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C.530 VIRGINIA ROAD, P.O. BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-0036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Molded Plastic Interlocking Panels to Support the Installation of Tubing for Radiant Heating Systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Viega NA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Viega NA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VIEGA NA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by VIEGA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by VIEGA GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by VIEGA HOLDING GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named SNAP PANEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 17, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 9, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |