USPTO serial 78722152
GIGABITER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIGABITER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N. QUINN
CHARLES N QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP10TH FL2000 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transport for destruction of electronic and optical equipment and scrap, namely, electrical equipment, electronic media and optical media, main-frame computers, personal computers, circuit boards, power supplies, cables, hard drives, floppy drives, CD-Rom drives, tape drives, monitors, keyboards, network equipment, telecommunications equipment, electronic components, transformers, electrical equipment assemblies and sub-assemblies, motors, reel-to-reel tape and tape drives, video tape and video tape drives and players, audio tape and audio tape drives and players, zip disks, CDs, media storage tapes, floppy disks, personnel identification badges and cards, microfiche, microfilm, electronic medical devices, electronic and optically-based navigational devices, electronic and optically-based automotive electronic devices, electronic and optically-based consumer devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Destroying electronic and optical equipment, namely, electrical equipment, electronic media and optical media, main-frame computers, personal computers, circuit boards, power supplies, cables, hard drives, floppy drives, CD-Rom drives, tape drives, monitors, keyboards, network equipment, telecommunications equipment, electronic components, transformers, electrical equipment assemblies and sub-assemblies, motors, reel-to-reel tape and tape drives, video tape and video tape drives and players, audio tape and audio tape drives and players, zip disks, CDs, media storage tapes, floppy disks, personnel identification badges and cards, microfiche, microfilm, electronic medical devices, electronic and optically-based navigational devices, electronic and optically-based automotive electronic devices, electronic and optically-based consumer devices, in a manner to render data stored therein or thereon unreadable and irretrievable; obliterating in the nature of erasing electronically stored data and optically stored data to render such data unreadable and irretrievable from electronic and optical equipment and components on which such data has been stored, namely, electrical and optical equipment, electronic storage media and optical storage media, main-frame computers, personal computers, circuit boards, power supplies, cables, hard drives, floppy drives, CD-Rom drives, tape drives, monitors, keyboards, network equipment, telecommunications equipment, electronic components, transformers, electrical equipment assemblies and sub-assemblies, motors, reel-to-reel tape and tape drives, video tape and video tape drives and players, audio tape and audio tape drives and players, zip disks, CDs, media storage tapes, floppy disks, personnel identification badges and cards, microfiche, microfilm, electronic medical devices, electronic and optically-based navigational devices, electronic and optically-based automotive electronic devices, electronic and optically-based consumer devices | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GSPS | NOTIFICATION OF SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GSPR | SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |