USPTO serial 78722844
BABYGIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABYGIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, namely dolls, doll apparel and accessories, action figures; action figure playing environments; action skill games; arcade games; athletic protective pads, namely, arm pads, knee pads, elbow pads and wrist pads for cycling, skating and skateboarding; balloons; baseballs; baseball gloves; basketballs; beach balls; bean bag dolls; board games; body boards; card games; Christmas tree ornaments; craft sets for decorating balloons; flying discs; footballs; hand held unit for playing electronic games; in-line skates; kites; mobiles for children; party favors in the nature of crackers and noisemakers; playground balls; playing cards; plush toys; puppets; puzzles; roller skates; skateboards; skates; skim boards; sleds; soccer balls; swim floats for recreational use; swim fins; toy action figures and accessories therefor; toy vehicles and play sets; toy scooters; volleyballs; water wing swim aids for recreational use; wind-up toys; yo-yos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |