USPTO serial 78723213
COMFORTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMFORTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fountain Set (Holdings) Limited
Kwai Chung, New Territories, HK
Fountain Set (Holdings) Limited
Kwai Chung, New Territories, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen Cooney-Porter
KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUST1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Adhesive fabric for application by heat; chenille fabric; cotton fabrics; crepe fabrics; dimity; fabric of imitation animal skins; fabrics for textile use, namely, polyester fabrics, synthetic fabrics, cotton fabrics, cotton based mixed fabrics, elastic fabrics; fiberglass fabrics for textile use; flannel; fustian; hemp fabric, namely, hemp cloth, hemp yarn fabrics; jersey, namely, jersey fabric for clothing, jersey material; jute fabric; knitted fabric; lingerie fabric; linings, namely textile used as lining for clothing, linen lining fabric for shoes; non-woven textile fabrics; ramie fabric; rayon fabric; silk, namely, silk cloth, silk blankets; silk fabrics for printing patterns; upholstery fabrics; velvet; unfitted furniture coverings of textile; woolen fabric | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely blouses, dresses, dress skirts, knitted underwear, pants, skirts, socks, ties, t-shirts, shirts; dress clothing, namely formal wear, namely, tuxedos, tuxedo belts and evening wear, namely, evening dresses, evening gowns for men, women and children; casual clothing, namely, t-shirts, shorts, sweatpants; athletic clothing, namely, athletic uniforms; headgear, namely, hats, caps and bonnets; footwear; jersey, namely, sports jerseys, sleeveless jerseys; silk, namely, silk scarves | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Dyeing of clothing; dyeing of textile and fabric; dyeing of shoes; dyeing of carpets; textile knitting; cotton spinning; pattern printing; custom manufacture of clothing, namely, casual clothing, athletic clothing, formal clothing and evening wear; embroidery; custom manufacture of drapery; custom manufacture of furniture; custom manufacture of garments, thread, yarns, fabric and textile products, namely, adhesive fabric for application by heat, chenille fabric, cotton fabrics, crepe, namely, crepe cloth, dimity, fabric of imitation animal skins, fabrics for textile use, fiberglass fabrics for textile use, flannel, fustian, hemp fabric, namely, hemp cloth, hemp yarn fabrics, jersey, namely, jersey fabric, jersey material, jute fabrics, ramie fabric, silk, namely, silk cloth, silk blankets, silk fabrics for printing patterns, upholstery fabrics, velvet, furniture coverings of textile, woolen fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fountain Set (Holdings) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Fountain Set (Holdings) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named COMFORTON
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |