USPTO serial 78723222
INVISI.DRI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INVISI.DRI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fountain Set (Holdings) Limited
Kwai Chung, New Territories, HK
Fountain Set (Holdings) Limited
Kwai Chung, New Territories, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen Cooney-Porter
KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUST1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabrics for textile use, namely, adhesive fabric for application by heat; chenille fabric; cotton fabrics; crepe fabric; dimity; fabric of imitation animal skins; fiberglass fabrics for textile use; flannel; fustian; hemp fabric; jersey; jute fabric; knifed fabric; lingerie fabric; textile used as lining for clothes; non-woven textile fabrics; ramie fabric; rayon fabric; silk; silk fabrics for printing patterns; upholstery fabrics; velvet; unfitted furniture coverings of textile; woolen fabric crepe; woolen fabric | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, blouses, dresses, dress skirts, knitted underwear, pants, skirts, socks, ties, t-shirts, shirts; dress clothing, namely, suits, gowns, tuxedos for men, women and children; casual clothing, namely, sweat pants, sweat shirts; athletic clothing, namely, athletic uniforms; headgear, namely hats, caps and bonnets; footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Dyeing of clothing, dyeing of textile and fabric; dyeing of shoes, dyeing of carpets; textile knitting for others; cotton spinning for others; pattern printing; custom manufacture of clothing, namely casual clothing, athletic clothing, formal clothing and evening wear; tailoring or dressmaking, embroidery; custom manufacture of drapery; custom manufacture of furniture; custom manufacture of garments, thread, yarns fabric and textile products, namely adhesive fabric for application by heat; chenille fabric; cotton fabrics; crepe; dimity; fabric of imitation animal skins; fabrics for textile use; fiberglass fabrics for textile use; flannel; fustian; hemp fabric; jersey; jute fabric; knitted fabric; lingerie fabric; linings; non-woven textile fabrics; ramie fabric; rayon fabric; silk; silk fabrics for printing patterns; upholstery fabrics; velvet; furniture coverings of textile; woolen fabric crepe; woolen fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fountain Set (Holdings) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Fountain Set (Holdings) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named INVISI.DRI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |