USPTO serial 78723381
JERICHO FORUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3562536Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JERICHO FORUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Reading, Berkshire, GB
Reading, Berkshire, GB
Reading, Berkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise I. Mroz
Denise I. Mroz Woodcock Washburn LLPCira Centre, 12th Floor2929 Arch StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19104-2891Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation and advisory services; information in the field of business, provided via an on-line computer database or the internet; data processing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer, computer systems and computer software consultation and advisory services; research and development of computer software; computer programming; computer software design; writing of computer software; updating of computer software and computer software systems; computer services consultation and advisory services for business purposes, computer systems consultation and advisory services for business purposes, and computer software consultation and advisory services for business purposes; computer compatibility verification, testing, analysis and evaluation services; providing information services relating to computerisation and systems design implementation; consultancy in the nature of computer system and computer software specification services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 15, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |