USPTO serial 78723528
KISSED BY WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KISSED BY WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Graham
LAWRENCE D GRAHAM BLACK LOWE & GRAHAM PLLC701 5TH AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104-7009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Manually operated metal pipes and plumbing equipment, namely, metal pipes for plumbing use | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Heating equipment, namely, pipes for heating boilers, thermostatic valves, steam generation equipment, namely, steam generators, steam valves, sanitary equipment, namely, pipes being parts of sanitary facilities and water supply equipment, namely, water faucet spout, water coolers; manually operated metal valves for plumbing use | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorships in the field of plumbing and water supply, retail store services in the field of plumbing and water supply; advertising services, namely, creating corporate marketing campaigns for others in the field of plumbing and water supply; business marketing services for others in the field of plumbing and water supply, demonstration display, namely, business merchandising display services in the field of plumbing and water supply; business appraisals in the field of plumbing and water supply, and market, consumer research services in the field of plumbing and water supply; and franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of plumbing stores; licensing of fluid control engineering, shower technology, jet technology and water supply engineering in the plumbing industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design for others in the fields of fluid control engineering, shower technology, jet technology and water supply engineering; technology consultation and research in the fields of fluid control engineering, shower technology, jet technology and water supply engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Methven Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Methven Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KISSED BY WATER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |