Drawing for SPARK

USPTO serial 78723682

SPARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Edwards

Mark S. Edwards Edwards Law Group, Inc.2211 Park BoulevardPalo Alto, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009cellular telephone systems and electronic communications devices, namely apparatus comprising peripheral hardware and software for use with cellular telephone systems, handsets and other electronic communications devices, for the management, download, back-up, transfer and synchronization of contacts and configuration information between cellular telephones and other electronic communication devices, and to enhance the performance and usability of such devices and systemsABANDONEDSep 16, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 25, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 25, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 13, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 16, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance