USPTO serial 78723688
METHVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3686119Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2009
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with METHVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Graham
Lawrence D. Graham Lowe Graham Jones701 Fifth AvenueSuite 4800Seattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | (Based on 44(e)) Manually operated metal valves, metal pipes and plumbing equipment, namely, manually operated metal valves and metal pipes for plumbing use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | (Based on 44(e)) plumbing fittings, namely, shower units and enclosures; shower baths; shower roses, handsets, hoses and mountings; shower taps; faucets; beauty showers; shower mixers; shower control valves; sanitary equipment, namely, pipes being parts of sanitary facilities; and water supply equipment, namely, water faucet and shower spouts and water coolers; plumbing fittings, namely, valves, manually operated plumbing valves, tub control valves and stopcocks; water supply equipment for use in the beauty industry, namely, facial shower handsets, shower handsets for massage purposes; shower infusion apparatus and instruments, namely, shower valves and heads for infusing bath products into the shower water spray | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | (Based on 44(e)) Wholesale distributorships in the field of plumbing and water supply, retail store services in the field of plumbing and water supply; advertising services, namely, creating corporate marketing campaigns for others in the field of plumbing and water supply; business marketing services for others in the field of plumbing and water supply; demonstration display, namely, business merchandising display services in the field of plumbing and water supply; business appraisals in the field of plumbing and water supply; market research and consumer research services in the field of plumbing and water supply; and franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of plumbing stores | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e)) Design for others in the fields of fluid control engineering, shower technology, jet technology and water supply engineering; technology consultation and research in the fields of fluid control engineering, shower technology, jet technology and water supply engineering; Licensing of intellectual property in the nature of fluid control, shower, jet and water supply engineering and technology concepts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Methven Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Methven Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Methven Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named METHVEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |