USPTO serial 78723848
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Lacey
BRIAN E LACEY WALTERSLACEY LLP35 INDIA STSUITE 300BOSTON, MA 02110| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Art pictures; Art prints; Drawings; Graphic art reproductions; Paintings; Paintings and calligraphic works; Paintings and their reproductions; Printed art reproductions | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Capri pants; Denim jackets; Denims; Down jackets; Dress shirts; Dresses; Hats; Heavy jackets; Jackets; Jeans; Jogging pants; Knit shirts; Leather jackets; Leather pants; Light-reflecting jackets; Long jackets; Men and women jackets, coats, trousers, vests; Night shirts; Open-necked shirts; Pants; Rain jackets; Rainproof jackets; Shirts; Shirts for suits; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Ski jackets; Ski pants; Skirts; Skirts and dresses; Sleep shirts; Sleepwear; Sleeved or sleeveless jackets; Snow pants; Snowboard pants; Sport shirts; Sports jackets; Sports shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Suede jackets; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Tap pants; Toboggan hats, pants and caps; Track pants; Trousers; Vests; Waterproof jackets and pants; Wind resistant jackets; Wind-jackets | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 29, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |