Drawing for Serial No. 78723912

USPTO serial 78723912

Serial No. 78723912

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78723912?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher D. Erickson

Christopher D. Erickson Tonkon Torp LLP888 SW Fifth Avenue1600 Pioneer TowerPortland, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Bicycle wheelsACTIVEJun 30, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 16, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 14, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 22, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 12, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 15, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 15, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 15, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 15, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance