Drawing for H-E-B OPTI-MEAL

USPTO serial 78723982

H-E-B OPTI-MEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H-E-B OPTI-MEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirt S. O'Neill

KIRT S ONEILL AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPPO BOX 12870SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212-0870UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Ready to drink meal replacement shakesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 18, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 18, 2007LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jul 11, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance