USPTO serial 78723989
(PHONE) RED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with (PHONE) RED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | consumer products; computer software and hardware; sound and audiovisual recordings, downloadable sound and audiovisual recordings, ring tones, telecommunications and telephone devices, computer games and software; wireless telecommunications devices and equipment; gaming equipment; electronic devices and equipment; eyewear; toys and games; automobiles, trucks, automotive equipment and accessories; merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | consumer products; printed materials, books, school supplies, desk supplies and accessories; party supplies; writing instruments, home, bedroom, bathroom and kitchen accessories; merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | consumer products; clothing; footwear; headwear; fashion articles and accessories; personal care products, cosmetics, toiletries, fragrances; merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | consumer products; food, beverages, wines, alcoholic beverages; merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | consumer services; telecommunications services; charitable services, including promoting the goods and services of others through the use of advertising and marketing campaigns; online retail and mail order services, retail store services; charitable fundraising; financial services, banking services; purchasing and delivering life-saving drugs to Africa to fight HIV and AIDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | consumer services; entertainment services; educational services; public awareness campaigns; internet services; restaurant services; fast-food restaurant services; hotel services; airline services; airline travel services; travel agency services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Persuaders, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named (PHONE) RED
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |