USPTO serial 78724017
FLAMINGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SERVANCE, RENEE L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLAMINGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Croydon, Surrey, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole F. Barrett
CAROLE F BARRETT3 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 7SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | depilatory preparations and creams; non-medicated cosmetic preparations for skin renewal for revitalizing, refreshing and soothing the skin after use of depilatory preparations and creams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |