USPTO serial 78724078
MISSHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MISSHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas P. O'Connell
Thomas P. O'Connell O'Connell Law Office1026A Massachusetts AvenueArlington, MA 02476UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Nourishing skin creams, eyebrow pencils, enamel for manicure, lipsticks, mascara, nail polish, liquid foundations, cheek blushers, sunscreen creams and lotions, skin milk lotions, skin toners, eye shadow, eau de cologne, common lotions for face and body care, cold creams pressed face powder for compacts, cleansing cream foundation creams, skin whitening creams, perfumes, hair lotions, soaps and detergents, perfumery, fragrances for personal use and incenses, false nails, false eyelashes, adhesives for affixing false eyelashes, dentifrices, anti-static dryer sheets for household use, polishing preparations, polishing papers, paint stripping preparations, shoe creams | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |