USPTO serial 78724125
TIC TOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3446644Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIC TOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruno Tarabichi
Bruno Tarabichi Owens Tarabichi LLP111 N. Market Street, Suite 730San Jose, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Journals, namely, pre-printed, fill-in-the-blank, and blank writing journals for personal and family organization and scheduling; personal organizers; daily planners; time planners; calendars; record-keeping logbooks and binders; note pads; memo pads for use as to-do checklists; booklets in the field of time management and organization; greeting cards; guidebooks and directories featuring community activity and time management resource information; printed charts, namely, printed wall charts for time management and scheduling and activity planning; personal organizers in the nature of flip books used for time management and organization; pocket memorandum books; newsletters in the field of time management, organization, scheduling and parenting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nunes, Catherine L.
- Other trademarks owned by Nunes, Catherine L.
- Other trademarks owned by Catherine L. Nunes
- Other trademarks owned by TIME TOO, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named TIC TOC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |