USPTO serial 78724138
SWIMMABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWIMMABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care, bath and cosmetic products, namely, eye shaddow, eye liner, mascara, blush, lip liner, brow pencils, lipstick, lip gloss, lip balms, cosmetic and lip color palettes, undereye concealers, foundation, face powder, personal soaps, bath oil, moisturizer, fragrances and perfumes, deodorants, talcum powder, shampoo, conditioner, hair styling gel, hair styling spray, nail polish, bronzer, sun tan lotion, sun screens, facial cleanser and facial toner | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |