Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78724442?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78724442. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns HYBRID SYSTEM?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78724442, the listed owner(s) include: Poly-clip System Corp..

What is USPTO serial number 78724442?

Serial number 78724442 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark HYBRID SYSTEM. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover HYBRID SYSTEM?

The public record lists International Classes: 007. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78724442

HYBRID SYSTEM

Q: What is the current status of HYBRID SYSTEM?

HYBRID SYSTEM (78724442) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 30, 2005
Status date: Dec 1, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYBRID SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Poly-clip System Corp.
Mundelein, IL
Other trademarks owned by Poly-clip System Corp.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy M. McCarthy

TIMOTHY M MCCARTHY TREXLER BUSHNELL GIANGIORGI ET AL105 W ADAMS ST FL 36CHICAGO, IL 60603-6299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	food preparation apparatus, namely, automated sausage stuffers, automated sausage machines	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 1, 2008	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 1, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Sep 29, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 15, 2008	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Mar 4, 2008	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Mar 4, 2008	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Mar 4, 2008	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Feb 4, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 5, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Dec 5, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jun 5, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 17, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 17, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Apr 25, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 4, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 4, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 5, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—