Drawing for DA VINCI

USPTO serial 78724992

DA VINCI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DA VINCI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perla M. Kuhn

HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines and sparkling winesABANDONEDDec 31, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance