USPTO serial 78725081
VIRTUAL FRAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL FRAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harry J. C. Wittbrod
HARRY J C WITTBROD HARRY J C WITTBROD ESQ1630 SCHILLER AVE STE 1CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44223UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Mounted posters, poster board, posters, posters made of paper, unmounted posters | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2005 |
| 027 | Cloth wall coverings; Cork for use as a floor or wall covering; Decorative slip-resistant floor covering in sheet form; Non-textile wall coverings; Non-textile wall hangings; Plastic wall coverings; Resilient hard surface covering for floors, walls and other surfaces; Sheets of plastic for covering walls; Tapestry-style wall hangings, not of textile; Vinyl wall coverings; Wallpaper in the nature of roomsize decorative adhesive wall coverings | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |