Drawing for ACONX

USPTO serial 78725781

ACONX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACONX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380)

James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380) Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch LLPP.O. Box 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Network access server hardware; motherboards; integrated circuits; computer systems, namely, computer hardware, computer peripherals and operating software; computer software, namely, device driver software and utility program software for use in operating computer peripherals; computer interface boards; video graphics accelerator card; electric connectors; computer servers, namely, file servers and network communication servers; computer and computer peripherals, namely, external hard drives and floppy drives, external CD-ROM drives and tape drives, computer disk drive, disk array, RAID (redundant array of independent disks) controllersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance