Drawing for SCANDIX

USPTO serial 78725959

SCANDIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SCANDIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philana S. Handler

PHILANA S HANDLER WHITHAM, CURTIS & CHRISTOFFERSON PC11491 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 340RESTON, VA 20190-5244UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Spare parts for automobiles, not including snowmobiles, namely, exhausts for motors and engines, starters, automotive exhaust pipes, starter alternators, and fans for land vehicle enginesACTIVE—
011Headlights and headlight inserts for automobiles, not including snowmobiles; tail lights for vehicles, flashlights, and anti-dazzle devices for automobile headlights, all of the foregoing for land vehicles, not including snowmobilesACTIVE—
012Automobiles, not including snowmobiles; spare parts for automobiles, not including snowmobiles, namely, fans not for engine use for land vehicles in the nature of ventilation and motor cooling fans, brakes, steering brakes, directional signals for vehicles, horns, gears for vehicles, gear wheels and shifts, clutches, motors, and drive and transmission belts, all of the foregoing for land vehicles, not including snowmobiles; brake cylinders for motors of land vehicles, not including snowmobiles; automobile bodies, vehicle seats, steering wheels for vehicles, wheels for land vehicles, tires, wheel rims, valves for vehicle tires, and suspension shock absorbers for vehicles, all of the foregoing for land vehicles, not including snowmobiles; accessories for automobiles, not including snowmobiles, namely, trailer hitches, luggage carriers, ski carriers, mudguards, anti-skid tire chains for land vehicles, air deflectors in the nature of air foils, head-rests for seats, safety belts, and safety seats for childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance