USPTO serial 78726550
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rancho Dominguez, CA
RANCHO DOMINGUEZ, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Stockton Kozak
LORI STOCKTON KOZAK BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; downloadable musical sound recordings and video recordings; pre-recorded audio and video tapes, cassettes, CDs, and DVDs featuring music and musical performances; video game software recorded on tapes, cassettes, CDs and DVDs; computer game discs and tapes; electronic game programs recorded on tapes, cassettes, CDs and DVDs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live performances by musical artist; providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, photographs, and other multimedia materials; music production services, music publishing services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 15, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |