Drawing for BISHOP LAMONT

USPTO serial 78726550

BISHOP LAMONT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MALIK, ATTIYA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BISHOP LAMONT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori Stockton Kozak

LORI STOCKTON KOZAK BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; downloadable musical sound recordings and video recordings; pre-recorded audio and video tapes, cassettes, CDs, and DVDs featuring music and musical performances; video game software recorded on tapes, cassettes, CDs and DVDs; computer game discs and tapes; electronic game programs recorded on tapes, cassettes, CDs and DVDsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, live performances by musical artist; providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, photographs, and other multimedia materials; music production services, music publishing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 15, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 15, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance