USPTO serial 78726760
QUALITYCALLING.COM QUALITY IS OUR CALLING CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUALITYCALLING.COM QUALITY IS OUR CALLING CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger H.Bora
Roger H.Bora THOMPSON HINE LLP10 W. SECOND STREET2000 COURTHOUSE PLAZA, NEDAYTON, OH 45402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetically encoded pre-paid telephone calling cards; Magnetically encoded debit cards; Magnetically encoded pre-paid cards for use in downloading content to wireless communications devices in the form of ring tones, graphics, logos, icons, screen savers, music, and games; Magnetically encoded gift cards and stored value cards; and Computer software that permits users to download content to wireless communications devices in the form of ring tones, graphics, logos, icons, screen savers, music, and games | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Non-magnetically encoded prepaid purchase cards; Non-magnetically encoded pre-paid telephone calling cards; Debit cards without magnetic coding; Non-magnetically encoded pre-paid cards for use in downloading content to wireless communications devices in the form of ring tones, graphics, logos, icons, screen savers, music, and games; and Non-magnetically encoded gift cards and stored value cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Prepaid telecommunications calling card services; Telephone calling card services; Pre-paid purchase card services namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Issuing stored value cards; and Providing on-line stored value accounts in an electronic environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Wireless telephone telecommunications services, namely, wireless mobile telephone calling plans; Prepaid long distance telephone services; Telephone telecommunications services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; Wireless telephone telecommunications services, namely, the transmission of ring tones, graphics, logos, icons, screen savers, music and games to wireless communication devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality Calling LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Quality Calling LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named QUALITYCALLING.COM QUALITY IS OUR CALLING CARD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |