USPTO serial 78726771
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Matthew Pritchard
J. MATTHEW PRITCHARD THE WEBB LAW FIRM436 SEVENTH AVENUE700 KOPPERS BUILDINGPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio and video tapes, pre-recorded floppy disks, and CD-ROMs in the field of securities, investment, and financial services; educational software in the field of financial services | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed educational materials, namely, books, manuals, brochures, and quizzes in the field of financial services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services relating to financial services, namely, conducting and providing educational programs, workshops, seminars, and forums in the field of financial services, namely, topics relating to finance theory, economics, portfolio theory, investment products, risk products, financial markets operations, analysis of financial statements, analysis of market trends, alternative financial products, securities ethics, regulation and compliance, behavioral finance, financial planning, wealth management, and management of distributors of financial services products; conducting and providing on-line educational programs, workshops, seminars, and forums in the field of financial services, namely, topics relating to finance theory, economics, portfolio theory, investment products, risk products, financial markets operations, analysis of financial statements, analysis of market trends, alternative financial products, securities ethics, regulation and compliance, behavioral finance, financial planning, wealth management, and management of distributors of financial services products; educational services relating to financial services,namely, creating, preparing, editing, compiling, publishing, and distributing instructional materials in the field of financial services, namely, topics relating to finance theory, economics, portfolio theory, investment products, risk products, financial markets operations, analysis of financial statements, analysis of market trends, alternative financial products, securities ethics, regulation and compliance, behavioral finance, financial planning, wealth management, and management of distributors of financial services products for others; educational examination services in the field of financial services, namely, topics relating to finance theory, economics, portfolio theory, investment products, risk products, financial markets operations, analysis of financial statements,analysis of market trends, alternative financial products, securities ethics, regulation and compliance, behavioral finance, financial planning, wealth management, and management of distributors of financial services products; providing on-line educational services, namely, providing on-line class assignments and quizzes in the field of financial services, namely, topics relating to finance theory, economics, portfolio theory, investment products, risk products, financial markets operations, analysis of financial statements, analysis of market trends, alternative financial products, securities ethics, regulation and compliance, behavioral finance, financial planning, wealth management, and management of distributors of financial services products; providing recognition and incentives by the way of awards and designations to demonstrate excellence in the field of financial services, namely, topics relating to finance theory, economics, portfolio theory, investment products, risk products, financial markets operations, analysis of financial statements, analysis of market trends, alternative financial products, securities ethics, regulation and compliance, behavioral finance, financial planning, wealth management, and management of distributors of financial services products | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |