CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CLUB NEWPORT

USPTO serial 78726800

CLUB NEWPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLUB NEWPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Armando A. Flores

Armando A. Flores Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPOne Logan Square18th and Cherry StreetsPhiladelphia, PA 19103-6996

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate services, namely, real estate management of condominiums, houses, residential properties, and commercial propertiesACTIVE—
041Country club services in the nature of a golf course, tennis courts, swimming pool, fitness center, recreation room, equestrian facilities and programs, yachting facilities, water activities, and clubhouse; golf club services, namely, providing facilities for playing golf and conducting competitionsACTIVE—
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 6, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 2, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 4, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance